Skip to content

Trump vs. Twitter… Explained

One of the things I wanted to do on my channel was make useful educational videos, where I explain complicated or usually misunderstood topics in simple terms that anyone can understand. My first such educational video goes live today, and it’s about something that has hit the news recently: President Trump’s escalating bad blood with Twitter and his legal threats against the social media giant.

Twitter has decided to go to war with President Donald J Trump, who has hit back by threatening them with legal consequences for their partisan behaviour. Few realise that this battle could lead to the death of social media itself! Trump has issued an Executive Order regarding Section 230 protections, and how they might be removed if Twitter continues to indulge in “Editorial Conduct”.

In this video I provide a simplified overview of the media law that has come into play since Twitter decided to start censoring and criticising the US President’s Tweets, including the different legal responsibilities of Publishers and Platforms. Specifically, I’m talking about Section 230 from The Communications Decency Act of 1996.


TRANSCRIPT

0:00:00.000,0:00:05.180
Whatup nerds?! I’m Jay Shareef and
today I’m talking about Donald Trump.

0:00:05.180,0:00:08.320
Now I’m well aware that a lot of you watching this video

0:00:08.320,0:00:11.260
will think that everything Trump does is fantastic.

0:00:11.260,0:00:14.700
And there are many others who
think everything Trump does is evil.


0:00:14.700,0:00:17.420
This video isn’t for those people.

0:00:17.420,0:00:21.400
I’m not here to repeat your opinion back
to you. I’m here to talk about the facts.

0:00:21.400,0:00:24.440
And the fact is, when it comes to his row with Twitter,

0:00:24.440,0:00:28.940
President Trump is right about a lot
of things, and wrong about others.

0:00:28.940,0:00:32.140
Today, I’m going to explain
what’s been happening and why.

0:00:39.960,0:00:42.000
Honestly, I don’t really want to talk about Donald Trump

0:00:42.000,0:00:46.600
because no matter what you say half
the population is going to hate you.

0:00:46.600,0:00:51.600
But this is a really important issue
with enormous ramifications.

0:00:51.600,0:00:55.020
So… yeah, I’m talking about Donald Trump.

0:00:55.020,0:01:00.180
Now some of my friends absolutely love him,
and some of my friends absolutely loathe him.

0:01:00.800,0:01:04.720
Me? I’m pretty neutral.
Yes that’s right! I’m a centrist.

0:01:04.720,0:01:07.920
The fun thing about being a
moderate centrist nowadays is that

0:01:07.920,0:01:12.520
the right wingers all call you a communist,
and the left wingers all call you a nazi.

0:01:12.980,0:01:16.660
Because that is how political
discussions work now! Isn’t it a great?

0:01:17.100,0:01:19.620
No. It’s not. It’s really not.

0:01:20.060,0:01:22.600
Look, I don’t love Trump and I don’t hate him.

0:01:22.600,0:01:24.280
I am fascinated by him, though.

0:01:24.280,0:01:27.900
Because I think he’s either a mad man, or a genius.

0:01:27.900,0:01:29.460
Quite possibly both.

0:01:29.460,0:01:31.380
One thing I want to address right off the bat.

0:01:31.380,0:01:34.560
Yes, I am British and everyone
knows that Trump loves Britain.

0:01:34.560,0:01:39.340
Which for us Brits is a refreshing change
because Obama… well, Obama hated Britain.

0:01:39.340,0:01:40.880
He never said it directly.

0:01:40.880,0:01:44.800
But, like a passive-aggressive schoolgirl, he
was always making snarky little comments.

0:01:44.800,0:01:46.840
It was obvious he don’t like us.

0:01:46.840,0:01:51.880
So, yes it is a very nice change to have an
American President who truly loves our country.

0:01:51.880,0:01:55.260
But that’s not going to in any
way affect what I say here.

0:01:55.260,0:01:59.660
I’m only interested in the facts and
you should be as well. Let’s do this.

0:02:00.080,0:02:04.740
So it’s been a fascinating few weeks in the battle
between Twitter and President Donald Trump.

0:02:04.740,0:02:07.080
[Off screen] He’s not MY president!

0:02:07.080,0:02:08.480
What?

0:02:08.480,0:02:11.300
I said: He’s not MY President!

0:02:11.640,0:02:14.320
Oh look. It’s my little friend Pete Woke Man.

0:02:14.320,0:02:16.040
It’s Wokeman!

0:02:16.040,0:02:19.640
Yeah, of course it is. Hello Pete.
What’s offending you today?

0:02:20.200,0:02:23.500
Donald Trump! He’s not MY President.

0:02:23.500,0:02:26.380
Yes, we know he isn’t. You’re not even American.

0:02:26.380,0:02:30.240
Of course, he’s not your President. But he is
the President of the United States of America.

0:02:30.240,0:02:31.620
No he isn’t!

0:02:32.560,0:02:36.700
Look, every state in the United States
accepts he’s the President.

0:02:36.700,0:02:40.620
Both chambers of the US Congress
accept he’s the President.

0:02:40.620,0:02:44.300
Every agency of the US government
accepts he is the President.

0:02:44.300,0:02:48.120
Even his opponents accept that he won the election.

0:02:48.120,0:02:51.000
No he didn’t. Hillary got more votes!

0:02:51.000,0:02:53.020
Hillary Clinton conceded defeat.

0:02:53.020,0:02:56.760
Getting the most votes doesn’t mean you win.
That’s not how their system works.

0:02:56.760,0:03:01.560
That’s now how our system works, okay?
Trump is the President. Now shut up!

0:03:04.580,0:03:06.580
Stupid Pete Woke Man.

0:03:06.580,0:03:08.180
[Off screen] It’s Wokeman!

0:03:08.540,0:03:09.500
Idiot!

0:03:09.500,0:03:10.820
[Off screen] Nazi!

0:03:11.320,0:03:12.620
See? I told you.

0:03:12.620,0:03:14.700
[Off screen] And you’re fat!

0:03:16.260,0:03:20.400
Anyway, PRESIDENT Donald Trump is in a dispute

0:03:20.400,0:03:23.480
with Twitter that’s really escalated over the last few weeks.

0:03:23.480,0:03:25.840
Before we get into that it’s important to acknowledge

0:03:25.840,0:03:29.500
that President Trump has benefited
enormously from the existence of Twitter.

0:03:29.880,0:03:33.280
President Obama was the first to have
an official Presidential Twitter account.

0:03:33.640,0:03:38.040
But Trump is seen as the first President
to really harness the power of social media.

0:03:38.040,0:03:42.100
His ability to speak directly to his base
and mobilise them to support him

0:03:42.100,0:03:45.100
on various issues is ALL thanks to Twitter.

0:03:45.100,0:03:50.220
Now Twitter, like pretty much all of the big
tech companies, is very, very left-wing.

0:03:50.220,0:03:53.080
And they can’t stand the idea of Trump in power.

0:03:53.080,0:03:56.360
All of the social media companies
have been deliberately pushing

0:03:56.360,0:03:58.760
their progressive agendas for years now.

0:03:58.760,0:04:01.300
But they’ve been very subtle about it.

0:04:01.300,0:04:06.060
Usually by tweaking their algorithms
so that left-wing voices are amplified,

0:04:06.060,0:04:08.700
and right with voices are minimised.

0:04:08.700,0:04:13.380
Let’s be clear here. Social media companies
are absolutely 100% allowed to do this.

0:04:13.380,0:04:14.860
It’s not against the law.

0:04:14.860,0:04:18.100
Companies can and do support
different political agendas.

0:04:18.100,0:04:21.660
And if these same social media companies
were controlled by the right wing,

0:04:21.660,0:04:27.600
you can bet your bottom dollar they’d be manipulating
the algorithms to promote their agendas too.

0:04:27.600,0:04:31.480
Anyway, the social media companies
have been very subtle in the past.

0:04:31.480,0:04:35.300
But, recently, Twitter decided they
weren’t going to be subtle anymore.

0:04:35.840,0:04:39.460
They disagree with President Trump,
and they don’t care who knows it!

0:04:40.040,0:04:41.300
Here’s how it all went down…

0:04:41.720,0:04:47.300
On the 26th of May 2020, Trump put out the
following Tweet to his 81 million followers:

0:05:12.720,0:05:15.500
Side Note: this is an interesting issue for us Brits

0:05:15.500,0:05:20.900
because here in the UK everyone has the right
to apply for what we call “Postal Voting”.

0:05:20.900,0:05:23.980
You don’t need to give a reason.
No justification is necessary.

0:05:23.980,0:05:26.340
You just need to contact your local “Returning Officer”

0:05:26.340,0:05:29.060

  • that’s what we call the person
    who runs elections in your area –

0:05:29.060,0:05:31.920
and sign a form confirming you want to vote by post.

0:05:31.920,0:05:34.500
And that’s it. No questions asked.

0:05:34.500,0:05:38.060
However, there have been scandals
related to postal voting in the UK.

0:05:38.060,0:05:42.540
And people have even got to jail
for co-ordinated postal vote fraud.

0:05:42.540,0:05:47.640
So, yeah, I can understand why there might be
concerns about mail-in ballots and voting fraud.

0:05:48.220,0:05:52.220
In response to the President’s Tweets, Twitter
added the following warning to his Tweets:

0:05:53.180,0:05:55.180
“Get the facts about mail-in ballots”

0:05:56.540,0:06:00.520
And if you clicked on that warning it took you to
a page stating that the President was wrong,

0:06:00.940,0:06:04.680
and showing a load of articles and
Tweets that disagreed with Trump.

0:06:04.680,0:06:07.780
And quite a few of them that basically called him a liar.

0:06:08.240,0:06:13.540
As you can imagine, President Trump was less
than happy about that, so he hit back at Twitter.

0:06:14.060,0:06:17.360
Ironically, on Twitter, to say the following:

0:06:30.800,0:06:34.960
And then, on the 28th of May 2020,
the President signed an Executive Order

0:06:34.960,0:06:38.300
regarding some of the legal protections
that social media companies enjoy.

0:06:38.860,0:06:43.640
Which he called “Executive Order
on Preventing Online Censorship”.

0:06:43.640,0:06:46.040
Basically, what President Trump was stating was that

0:06:46.040,0:06:49.040
if a social media company behaves like a “Publisher”

0:06:49.040,0:06:53.300
then they must accept the responsibilities
that come with being a “Publisher”.

0:06:53.760,0:06:55.880
Now there are two issues here.

0:06:55.880,0:06:58.940
I think Trump is 100% correct about one of them.

0:06:58.940,0:07:02.180
And absolutely 100% wrong about the other.

0:07:02.180,0:07:04.560
Firstly, let’s talk about where Trump is wrong.

0:07:05.040,0:07:07.680
This is not a free speech issue.

0:07:08.000,0:07:10.480
It absolutely isn’t about free speech because

0:07:10.480,0:07:14.720
free speech laws prevent the government
from limiting your freedom of expression.

0:07:14.720,0:07:16.460
Twitter is not the government.

0:07:16.480,0:07:21.280
It’s a private company and it can pretty much
publish whatever it wants on its own website.

0:07:21.580,0:07:26.480
It can delete photos. It can ban
users. That is 100% legal.

0:07:27.180,0:07:32.080
It can also, 100% legally, tell people
it disagrees with President Trump.

0:07:32.480,0:07:36.140
But, by doing so, it has made a massive strategic error.

0:07:36.140,0:07:42.220
The sheer stupidity of Twitter taking on
President Trump in this way is breath-taking.

0:07:42.220,0:07:47.920
And I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump was basically
just waiting for Twitter to do something this idiotic.

0:07:48.220,0:07:54.140
Because now the President has a very powerful
legal opportunity to hit Twitter where it hurts.

0:07:54.140,0:07:56.240
To hit Twitter in the wallet.

0:07:56.240,0:07:59.980
Yes, this is absolutely about
money and about Twitter’s profits.

0:08:00.200,0:08:02.580
The legal aspect is complicated, as you’d expect,

0:08:02.580,0:08:06.600
but I’m going to try and explain
it in as simple a way as I can.

0:08:06.820,0:08:10.980
It’s all about the difference between
a “Publisher” and a “Platform”.

0:08:11.500,0:08:15.260
Imagine a fictional newspaper.
Let’s call it “The Daily Planet”.

0:08:15.480,0:08:20.460
Every day they’re sharing news and opinion with
their audience. That makes them a “Publisher”.

0:08:20.460,0:08:23.380
They are entirely responsible for
what’s written in the newspaper.

0:08:23.660,0:08:27.360
Now imagine one of their reporters wrote
an article about famous celebrity

0:08:27.360,0:08:31.360
but they didn’t check their facts properly
and they include a very obvious lie.

0:08:31.360,0:08:35.380
The reporter gives the article to their
Editor, and the Editor decides to print it.

0:08:35.760,0:08:41.440
They’ve printed a lie about someone and
then communicated that lie to the world.

0:08:41.440,0:08:43.560
They’ve defamed someone’s character.

0:08:43.840,0:08:46.840
That’s called a “libel” and they can be sued for it.

0:08:46.840,0:08:48.800
But who gets sued?

0:08:48.800,0:08:53.040
Is it the reporter? The Editor? Or the Newspaper itself?

0:08:53.800,0:08:56.220
The correct answer is: All three.

0:08:56.220,0:08:59.260
All three of them can be taken to court for
printing that lie.

0:08:59.269,0:09:02.779
That’s why journalists are supposed
to undergo years of training,

0:09:02.780,0:09:06.140
and newspaper Editors are very
careful about what they publish.

0:09:06.140,0:09:11.140
Because, if you defame someone’s character,
then you could end up losing a lot of money.

0:09:11.140,0:09:14.120
So newspapers need to be
careful they don’t spread lies.

0:09:14.680,0:09:19.699
However, certain people are immune from
prosecution even though they’re helping

0:09:19.700,0:09:21.640
the newspaper share that same lie.

0:09:22.300,0:09:25.180
You won’t be able to sue any
retailer who sells that newspaper.

0:09:25.640,0:09:30.040
You won’t be able to sue a library, for example,
for keeping a copy of that newspaper.

0:09:30.560,0:09:34.080
Why? Because by law they’re
not considered to be “Publishers”.

0:09:34.080,0:09:36.060
They are “Platforms” (or “Forums”).

0:09:36.060,0:09:40.200
And, as I mentioned earlier, there is a legal
difference between a Publisher and a Platform.

0:09:40.720,0:09:42.640
Here are a few examples of Publishers:

0:09:47.460,0:09:51.700
Bloggers: Yes, even if you have a personal website,

0:09:51.700,0:09:56.960
if you’re sharing news or opinion, you are
legally considered to be a Publisher.

0:09:56.960,0:10:00.580
And you are legally responsible
for what you put on that website.

0:10:01.160,0:10:04.600
Whereas, these are Platforms (or Forums).

0:10:11.700,0:10:17.020
They are not responsible for any libellous or
illegal content distributed using their services.

0:10:17.480,0:10:22.320
And in the USA this is all because of
The Communications Decency Act of 1996.

0:10:22.800,0:10:27.360
So why is it that social media companies are
not treated as Publishers under the law?

0:10:27.900,0:10:31.840
Why are they not legally responsible
for what’s posted on their websites?

0:10:32.660,0:10:35.820
Well, back when the internet was still taking off,

0:10:35.820,0:10:38.600
across different countries, various laws were introduced

0:10:38.600,0:10:41.720
to make the distinction between Publishers and Platforms.

0:10:42.400,0:10:45.520
And it made sense. If social media
companies were legally responsible for

0:10:45.520,0:10:50.340
their users’ posts, then they’d have to
check your posts before they went online.

0:10:50.820,0:10:52.900
This would mean three things:

0:11:06.120,0:11:10.360
If social media companies had the same
responsibilities as Publishers then

0:11:10.360,0:11:15.200
social media, as we know it today,
absolutely would not exist.

0:11:15.520,0:11:21.360
However, by law, they are treated as Platforms.
Basically they’re online Bulletin Boards.

0:11:21.860,0:11:24.900
So what makes Platforms different from Publishers?

0:11:25.540,0:11:29.040
Legally it’s complicated. I would sum it up as follows:

0:11:34.600,0:11:36.180
What does that mean?

0:11:36.180,0:11:40.600
Well, firstly, they don’t delay your
posts before they are communicated.

0:11:40.600,0:11:44.280
You type something into Twitter
and it appears immediately.

0:11:44.280,0:11:48.920
Whereas, a newspaper – a Publisher – might delay
or even block an article from being published.

0:11:49.680,0:11:52.620
Secondly, they aren’t allowed
to change what you’ve posted.

0:11:52.940,0:11:56.280
Your Twitter posts should appear
exactly as you wrote them.

0:11:56.560,0:11:59.580
They do not add to, or delete
anything from, your Tweets.

0:11:59.580,0:12:01.680
A newspaper, on the other hand, being a Publisher,

0:12:01.680,0:12:05.180
will often change a reporter’s
words before printing them.

0:12:05.340,0:12:07.680
A couple of things worth keeping in mind though.

0:12:07.680,0:12:12.460
Firstly, Platforms do have a responsibility
to delete any illegal material that is posted,

0:12:12.460,0:12:17.280
like libellous statements or copyright
infringements, if it’s brought to their attention.

0:12:17.580,0:12:22.060
Secondly, a Platform can have rules
about how YOU are allowed to use it.

0:12:22.060,0:12:26.380
And they have a right to delete material
that they consider unacceptable to them.

0:12:26.380,0:12:31.200
So if they want to ban nudity, or profanity,
from their Platform then they can.

0:12:31.200,0:12:37.200
And they are entitled to delete your posts or, ban
you from their services, if you break those rules.

0:12:37.680,0:12:40.420
So what’s all this got to do with Trump and Twitter?

0:12:40.420,0:12:44.640
Well, let me explain using an
extreme hypothetical example.

0:12:44.900,0:12:48.000
Let’s say that tomorrow Mark Zuckerberg joins PETA.

0:12:48.000,0:12:50.860
And he wants all of you to do the same.

0:12:50.860,0:12:54.740
So, Facebook decides it’s now a pro-Vegan Platform.

0:12:54.740,0:12:57.420
It is perfectly allowed to make that decision.

0:12:57.420,0:13:01.360
And it is perfectly allowed to
delete any anti-Vegan posts.

0:13:01.360,0:13:05.260
As a Platform it is allowed to do that.
Deleting posts is fine.

0:13:05.720,0:13:09.380
However, imagine that, instead
of deleting anti-Vegan posts,

0:13:09.380,0:13:13.540
Facebook starts adding pro-Vegan
messages to those posts.

0:13:14.180,0:13:17.200
Now it is no longer passively sharing communications.

0:13:17.200,0:13:20.740
It is actively interfering with anti-Vegan posts.

0:13:20.740,0:13:24.480
In that situation, Facebook is no
longer behaving like a Platform.

0:13:24.480,0:13:27.220
It has engaged in “Editorial Conduct”.

0:13:27.220,0:13:29.760
It is behaving like a Publisher.

0:13:29.760,0:13:32.980
And that is why Donald Trump is absolutely right.

0:13:32.980,0:13:36.960
By adding a message to his Tweets,
basically saying “The President is wrong!”

0:13:36.960,0:13:41.140
Twitter has crossed the line from Platform to Publisher.

0:13:41.140,0:13:44.620
And if it is a Publisher then
Twitter is legally responsible for

0:13:44.620,0:13:49.220
every word, every photo, every video,
that is posted on their website.

0:13:49.220,0:13:53.520
If Twitter is a publisher then they can be
punished for every libellous comment,

0:13:53.520,0:13:58.580
every copyright infringement, every incitement
to violence, that is posted on their website.

0:13:58.580,0:14:04.680
And, in a society as litigious as the USA, they
would very quickly go bankrupt if that was the case.

0:14:04.680,0:14:08.420
It’s what happened to Gawker,
and it could happen to Twitter too.

0:14:08.620,0:14:12.480
Which is exactly why Twitter
have been utterly moronic

0:14:12.480,0:14:15.100
in trying to take on Donald Trump in this way.

0:14:15.100,0:14:17.440
They have made a massive strategic error.

0:14:17.660,0:14:20.780
Their shareholders should be
absolutely furious with them right now

0:14:20.780,0:14:25.440
because, by playing politics, they’ve opened
themselves up to potential disaster.

0:14:25.440,0:14:30.060
That’s not an exaggeration. Twitter
could go bankrupt and cease to exist.

0:14:30.060,0:14:33.600
What’s truly bizarre is that Twitter don’t
seem to understand the seriousness

0:14:33.600,0:14:35.600
of the mistake they’ve already made.

0:14:35.600,0:14:39.080
And now they are, apparently, doubling down

0:14:39.080,0:14:41.700
because the very next day

0:14:41.700,0:14:44.900
Twitter accused the President of “glorifying violence”

0:14:44.900,0:14:46.660
and hid one of his Tweets.

0:14:47.460,0:14:52.840
The message in question used the phrase
“when the looting starts, the shooting starts”.

0:14:53.460,0:14:57.580
What’s interesting is that the same
message was posted on Facebook,

0:14:57.580,0:15:01.600
who made the decision to not
interfere with the President’s post.

0:15:02.720,0:15:08.220
So it looks like Twitter seems to be the only social
media giant going to war with the President.

0:15:08.760,0:15:11.520
Was President Trump glorifying violence?

0:15:11.520,0:15:13.300
Personally I don’t think he was.

0:15:13.300,0:15:17.480
And any of you who studied civics or law will
know that there are two kinds of violence:

0:15:17.480,0:15:20.440
Legitimate violence and illegitimate violence.

0:15:20.440,0:15:24.000
And every nation on earth basically
agrees to the principle that:

0:15:28.300,0:15:32.280
And who is the Head of State?
Well that would be a certain Donald J Trump.

0:15:32.280,0:15:34.660
His Tweet wasn’t glorifying violence.

0:15:34.660,0:15:39.100
It was assuring people that the government
was willing to use legitimate violence

0:15:39.100,0:15:40.980
to maintain law and order.

0:15:41.200,0:15:47.200
The President isn’t just legally entitled to do
that, it’s actually part of his job to do that.

0:15:47.200,0:15:51.520
But Twitter seems to have decided
that they are going to war with Trump,

0:15:51.860,0:15:54.900
and they don’t seem too worried about civics or the law.

0:15:55.040,0:15:59.380
Now, because he’s taking aim
at an online media company,

0:15:59.380,0:16:04.020
some Trump opponents have claimed that
the President is violating the First Amendment.

0:16:04.020,0:16:06.120
I think that’s absolute nonsense.

0:16:06.120,0:16:10.420
President Trump isn’t telling Twitter
what they can and can’t say.

0:16:10.820,0:16:16.980
He is telling Twitter that they have additional
legal responsibilities if they actively choose

0:16:16.980,0:16:19.500
to be part of the political discourse.

0:16:19.620,0:16:23.600
He’s not changing the rules. He’s saying
the existing rules apply to Twitter as well.

0:16:23.600,0:16:30.240
Personally speaking, as a neutral, I think President
Trump’s interpretation of the law is 100% correct.

0:16:30.560,0:16:35.740
I also think social media companies would be
better off staying away from political posturing

0:16:36.200,0:16:39.640
and leave the editorializing to, you know…

0:16:40.200,0:16:43.580
the newspapers, and broadcasters, and real journalists.

0:16:43.580,0:16:48.000
People who know what they’re doing
and have been doing it for decades.

0:16:48.560,0:16:53.480
So… that’s it. That’s the end. You may now
post your comments under this video

0:16:53.480,0:16:59.180
accusing me of being either a communist, or a
nazi, depending on your personal political bias.

0:16:59.600,0:17:02.960
If you found this video useful then please click LIKE and SUBSCRIBE.

0:17:02.960,0:17:04.920
I’ve got plenty more videos of the way

0:17:04.920,0:17:08.860
I am on Twitter. But who knows
how long that’s going to last.

0:17:08.860,0:17:11.200
So you should probably follow me on Facebook!

0:17:11.200,0:17:12.700
Later nerds!

Published inPolitics

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *